For President-Elect Obama, a New Agenda for Latin America

By Stephen Schlesinger

Posted: November 17, 2008

Print
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe (R) is greeted by his Mexican counterpart Felipe Calderon after a press conference at the presidential residence Los Pinos, in Mexico City.

Colombian President Alvaro Uribe (R) is greeted by his Mexican counterpart Felipe Calderon.

President Obama will be facing multiple crises when he takes office in January 2009. One of those crises, which is not often mentioned but may turn out to be a major one, will happen in Latin America—and very soon. That region was, as most observers agree, notoriously neglected during the eight years of the Bush presidency. And it was not a topic of any serious discussion during the presidential campaign. But it may be a matter that soon haunts our country.

For the Americas are crucial to the U.S. future—especially in today's calamitous economic downturn. Just look at the statistics. From 1996 to 2000, total U.S. merchandise trade with the hemisphere grew by 139 percent, compared with 96 percent for Asia and 95 percent for Europe.

The United States depends critically on Latin sources for its oil supplies; it gets 30 percent of its imports from the region, notably from Mexico and Venezuela, as opposed to 20 percent from the Middle East. And the Latin continent is where most of the illegal narcotics come from. Finally, Latinos now constitute 15 percent of the U.S. population, representing nearly 50 percent of recent U.S. population growth.

Yet Washington has spent scant time working on strengthening its trade or commercial relations over the past decade. While it has signed bilateral free trade pacts with 11 Latin nations (two are still awaiting congressional approval), it has, as of yet, no deal with Brazil, the continent's largest country as well as our second largest Latin trading partner (after Mexico), and it has not effectively pursued a region-wide free trade agreement covering all 34 countries of the hemisphere.

Instead, Washington has heralded as its main Latin-related policies the following: helping Columbia's fight against its FARC insurgency, tightening the U.S. embargo on Cuba, seeking to break up al Qaeda cells in Paraguay, cracking down on drug smugglers in Mexico and Guatemala and Colombia, and arresting and deporting illegal aliens. And the Bush administration has spent an inordinate amount of its political energy on attempting to counter the more militant leftist leaders in the region, especially those in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador, using diplomatic threats and suspension of aid and other retaliatory measures. This has ratcheted up tensions to the point that the first two of those governments have expelled U.S. ambassadors, while Ecuador is shutting down a U.S. antidrug operation.

This intense focus on security has come at the expense of the more pressing needs of the Latin region, namely helping to develop its economic and social structures and raising living standards and creating a more stable Latin middle class as well as stemming out-migration and reducing drug-related violence.

A new administration must begin to reorient American power toward a more measured and realistic approach to dealing with Latin America.

First, the new president must devise a comprehensive plan to help elevate living conditions throughout the hemisphere via broad-based trade pacts and targeted U.S. aid. As of today, 40 percent of Latins still live in poverty. Consideration should be given to resurrecting broad-based social programs like those that have worked in the past with the Latin community—such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy and President John F. Kennedy's Alliance for Progress.

Second, Washington must begin to reduce its unhealthy reliance on military programs in the Americas.

Third, America must also start to reach out to nations and leaders who don't necessarily like us on the grounds that, while we can disagree, we can still co-exist with one another.

President-elect Obama gave a lengthy speech last May that suggests that he is aware of this situation. In his address, he called for a new "Alliance for the Americas" in which he promised to support the consolidation of democracy around the hemisphere, including giving financial backing to independent judiciaries, free presses, progressive police forces, religious freedom, and the rule of law. He also said he would continue the battle against drug smuggling but would confront it not just with force but with corruption prosecutions, crime reduction, and crackdowns on drug lords.

In addition, he advocated comprehensive immigration reform and stated he would coordinate a new level of economic aid in order to elevate living standards, helping to fulfill the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals of halving poverty by 2015. Finally he vowed to appoint a special envoy for the Americas in the White House.

SysfySMusucRfYM

lemyaskin rulezz

lemyaskin of GA @ Sep 22, 2009 21:48:56 PM

As an ex pat who lives and works in Colombia, the US does not have a stronger ally in the region. Dropping the free trade agreement was akin to a slap in the face to most Colombians. I hope Obama uses this chance to strengthen ties between the two nations while engaging Brazil,and Ecuador more.

Most people in Colombia despise Chavez and would love to see their role in the US trade expanded. I can attest to the costs of American goods here which are outrageously expensive due to oppresive tariffs. I hope for the best but expect the worst.

jason @ Nov 19, 2008 15:16:04 PM

Obama is filling his cabinet with hillary blue dogs, dont expect change like we voted for because they think like republicans..,He wants hillary, the one that doesnt have the ability to talk to iran because (they might use it as propaganda against her) as sec. of state. That is same old politics as usual. All he needs now is lieberman to complete the blue dog presidentcy..Hillary must be very happy at all her friends getting positions..She would probably have put the same people in. Change right..

peggy of OH @ Nov 18, 2008 05:12:44 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Please enter the two words below into the text field underneath the image.
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Cartoons

advertisement

Two Takes On...

College Worth $50,000 Tuition?

No, not brand name schools, says Andrew Hacker. Yes, it's worth it, says Ronald Daniels.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

The Discovery Gunman's Radical Movement
Peter Roff

If Lee had been a Tea Party member or opposed to abortion rights the media would be in ecstasy.

Obama’s Futile Mideast Arm Twisting
Bonnie Erbe

Palestine’s Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu have their elbows twisted to the breaking point.

Immigration, Bush and the Economy
John Aloysius Farrell

The number of illegal immigrants dropped by almost two thirds between 2005 and 2009.

Polls Show Republican Gains Across the Board
Peter Roff

For the first time in decades the party is competitive in states it had largely written off.

National Wartime Museum Planned for D.C. Area
Peter Roff

Organizers plan to develop the American Wartime Museum just outside the nation’s Capital.

Iran’s ‘Temporary’ Marriage Controversy
Bonnie Erbe

For a third time, women have had to marshal forces to defeat a proposal by President Ahmadinejad.

Does Tea Party's Alaska Win Hurt the GOP?
Robert Schlesinger

Once again Republicans eschew electability. What will it cost them in the end?

The Gettysburg Casino Battle
John Aloysius Farrell

Pennsylvania should recognize the glitzy development on the battlefield can spoil the town’s character.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!